Harjo v. Wood

1931 OK 181, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 882
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 28, 1931·No. 19944·Published

Opinion

RILEY, J.;

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939, this day decided, 148 Okla. 265, 298 Pac. 611, and with which this ease, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ.; concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harjo v. Wood, 1931 OK 181, 5 P.2d 760, 148 Okla. 262, 1931 Okla. LEXIS 882 (Okla. 1931).

1931 OK 181 (Harjo v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. Gassaway
1931 OK 210 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
White Oak Refining Co. v. Whitehead
1931 OK 357 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)