Harjo v. Kunkle

254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 24, 1921·No. No. 160·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harjo v. Kunkle, 254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271 (1921).

254 U.S. 620 (Harjo v. Kunkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related