Harjo v. Kunkle

Supreme Court

Harjo v. Kunkle

254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 24, 1921

DocketNo. 160

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 U.S. 620 (Harjo v. Kunkle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harjo v. Kunkle, 254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued January 20, 1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Berkman v. United States, 250 U. S. 114, 118; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193. Mr. Lewis C. Lawson for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West and Mr. A. A. Davidson, for appellees, submitted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harjo-v-kunkle-scotus-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack