Hariston v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortg. Co.

82 F. 1001, 27 C.C.A. 680, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2034
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1897·No. No. 585·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Considering tliat tiie alleged trustee’s sale and adjudication were invalid, because of tire total want of authority on the part of the trustee to make any bid for, or adjudicate the property to, the Western Investment Company, there is no reversible error in the decree appealed from, and the same is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hariston v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortg. Co., 82 F. 1001, 27 C.C.A. 680, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2034 (5th Cir. 1897).

82 F. 1001 (Hariston v. Jarvis-Conklin Mortg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.