Hargy, D., Pet v. Toner, P.
This text of Hargy, D., Pet v. Toner, P. (Hargy, D., Pet v. Toner, P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DEBORAH R. HARGY, ED C. MALLOY, : No. 665 MAL 2014 ESQ. AND GENERATIONS LAW, P.C., : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : PAUL TONER, ESQ. BRIAN C.LEGROW, : ESQ. VINCENT B. MANCINI & : ASSOCIATES, LLCJOHN D' ANNUNZIO : VINCENT D' ANNUNZIO J & V : DEVELOPERS, INC, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hargy, D., Pet v. Toner, P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargy-d-pet-v-toner-p-pa-2015.