Hargrove v. United States

139 F.2d 1014, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4168
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1944
DocketNo. 10559
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 139 F.2d 1014 (Hargrove v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hargrove v. United States, 139 F.2d 1014, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4168 (5th Cir. 1944).

Opinion

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

We are not triers of fact. The law, in its wisdom, does not authorize this, court to substitute the reactions as to the facts which it gains from a perusal of the cold, printed type for those of the lower court which saw and heard the witnesses, observed their demeanor on the stand, and thus was placed in far better position to know the true and false than this court; and where, as here, we cannot say that there was no substantial evidence upon which the verdict and judgment of the lower court was based, the verdict and judgment of the court below will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roy Carmon Pritchard
417 F.2d 327 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Joseph William Gable v. United States
379 F.2d 549 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Glen William Ziemer
291 F.2d 100 (Seventh Circuit, 1961)
The United States v. Broadway Arrington
215 F.2d 630 (Seventh Circuit, 1954)
Barnes v. United States
192 F.2d 466 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)
Moore v. United States
161 F.2d 932 (Fifth Circuit, 1947)
Roberts v. United States
151 F.2d 664 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 F.2d 1014, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 4168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargrove-v-united-states-ca5-1944.