Hargrett v. Director

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Hargrett v. Director

866 S.W.2d 432, 44 Ark. App. 111, 1993 Ark. App. LEXIS 634

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 8, 1993

DocketE 93-244

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 866 S.W.2d 432 (Hargrett v. Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hargrett v. Director, 866 S.W.2d 432, 44 Ark. App. 111, 1993 Ark. App. LEXIS 634 (Ark. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal from the Board of Review on the grounds that the Board determined that the claimant’s last employer was First Environmental Services rather than Lafayette Partnership.

However, the Board did not dismiss the appellant’s claim for unemployment benefits but simply remanded the issue for the Agency “to issue a determination based on the claimant’s employment with First Environmental Services.”

The real issue in this case, based on the claimant’s notice of appeal to this court, is whether she is disqualified for benefits under Ark. Code. Ann.§ 11-10-513(a)(2) (1987). We do not think the Board’s order of remand is a final, appealable order. Therefore, the appeal to this court is dismissed, and the Board’s order of remand remains in effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal from the Board of Review on the grounds that the Board determined that the claimant’s last employer was First Environmental Services rather than Lafayette Partnership.

However, the Board did not dismiss the appellant’s claim for unemployment benefits but simply remanded the issue for the Agency “to issue a determination based on the claimant’s employment with First Environmental Services.”

The real issue in this case, based on the claimant’s notice of appeal to this court, is whether she is disqualified for benefits under Ark. Code. Ann.§ 11-10-513(a)(2) (1987). We do not think the Board’s order of remand is a final, appealable order. Therefore, the appeal to this court is dismissed, and the Board’s order of remand remains in effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

866 S.W.2d 432, 44 Ark. App. 111, 1993 Ark. App. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargrett-v-director-arkctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack