Hargraves v. Bath Central School District

237 A.D.2d 977, 654 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3608
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the follow[978] ing Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the causes of action seeking compensatory damages for alleged negligent conduct. The court erred, however, in failing to dismiss the cause of action seeking punitive damages. Punitive damages, may not be assessed against defendant Bath Central School District, which is a public corporation (see, Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332; Buck v Hooker Chems. & Plastics Corp., 117 Mise 2d 496). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, Jr., J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hargraves v. Bath Central School District, 237 A.D.2d 977, 654 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 977 (Hargraves v. Bath Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. William Floyd Union Free School District
136 A.D.3d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Krohn v. New York City Police Department
341 F.3d 177 (Second Circuit, 2003)
Trusievitz v. Bath Central School District
237 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)