Hargiss v. State

339 S.W.2d 538, 170 Tex. Crim. 164, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2125
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 26, 1960·No. No. 32295·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300.

The statement of facts accompanying this record contains no evidence that Morris County, where possession for the purpose of sale is alleged, is a dry area within the meaning of the Liquor Control Act, Art. 666-1 et .seq., Vernon’s Ann.P.C.

In order for this conviction to be sustained, proof of the dry status of Morris County must be proven or otherwise made to appear. Weatherman v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 272, 276 S.W.2d 524.

The evidence being insufficient, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hargiss v. State, 339 S.W.2d 538, 170 Tex. Crim. 164, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2125 (Tex. 1960).

339 S.W.2d 538 (Hargiss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Procell v. State
356 S.W.2d 320 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)