Hargis v. Bradford
This text of 283 U.S. 781 (Hargis v. Bradford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the return of the appellant to the rule issued January 19,1931, to show cause why the interlocutory decree of the specially constituted District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri, entered herein March 15,1930, should not be vacated and the cause remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the case as moot,
It is now here ordered that the interlocutory decree of the said specially constituted District Court entered in this cause March 15, 1930, be, and the same is hereby, vacated, and the cause is remanded to that court with directions to dismiss the case as moot, without costs to either party. United States v. Hamburg American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 475; Berry v. Davis, 242 U. S. 468, 470; Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 360; Heitmuller v. Stokes, 256 U. S. 359; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Norwegian Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106, 112; United States v. Anchor Coal Co., 279 U. S. 812.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 U.S. 781, 51 S. Ct. 342, 75 L. Ed. 1411, 1931 U.S. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargis-v-bradford-scotus-1931.