Hargett v. .

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hargett v. .

3 N.C. 76

DecidedJuly 5, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 76 (Hargett v. .) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hargett v. ., 3 N.C. 76 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The contents of a record lost or destroyed cannot be proven otherwise than by a copy. It is better to suffer a private mischief than a public inconvenience, especially one of such magnitude as the introducing of parol testimony to supply a record.

Quere de hoc by Reporter.

NOTE. — See Stuart v. Fitzgerald, 6 N.C. 255; S. c., 4 N.C. 17,234; Spencer v. Cohoon, 18 N.C. 27.

Overruled: Mobley v. Watts, 98 N.C. 288.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The contents of a record lost or destroyed cannot be proven otherwise than by a copy. It is better to suffer a private mischief than a public inconvenience, especially one of such magnitude as the introducing of parol testimony to supply a record.

Quere de hoc by Reporter.

NOTE. — See Stuart v. Fitzgerald, 6 N.C. 255; S. c., 4 N.C. 17,234; Spencer v. Cohoon, 18 N.C. 27.

Overruled: Mobley v. Watts, 98 N.C. 288.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargett-v-ncsuperct-1799.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack