Hargett v. Johns Hopkins Hospital

699 F. App'x 219
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 20, 2017
DocketNo. 17-6847
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 219 (Hargett v. Johns Hopkins Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hargett v. Johns Hopkins Hospital, 699 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kim L. Hargett, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hargett’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Hargett has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Giant Food Inc.
370 F.3d 423 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargett-v-johns-hopkins-hospital-ca4-2017.