Hargett v. Jackson

Fourth Circuit

Hargett v. Jackson

178 F. App'x 301

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2006·No. No. 05-7862·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Jackson, No. CA-04-392-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hargett v. Jackson, 178 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

178 F. App'x 301 (Hargett v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related