Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Department

172 F. App'x 27
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 2006
DocketNo. 05-7603
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 172 F. App'x 27 (Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriff's Department, 172 F. App'x 27 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Franklin Hargett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargett v. Forsyth County Sheriffs Dep’t, No. CA-03-440-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Robeson County, NC
733 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. North Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 F. App'x 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargett-v-forsyth-county-sheriffs-department-ca4-2006.