Hargadine v. Pulte

27 Mo. 423
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case falls within the principles and reasoning of the case of Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 316. Where a testator declares his wife to be his sole heir, the implication of an exclusion of his children is just as strong as where the estate is given to the wife “ as her own and exclusive property, and to the exclusion of all and every person or persons, be the same relatives or not.” In truth, the multiplication of words in this last case rather weakens the force of the first clause, as the phrase “ relatives” might be very naturally understood as not embracing one’s children.

The other judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hargadine v. Pulte, 27 Mo. 423 (Mo. 1858).

27 Mo. 423 (Hargadine v. Pulte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Strien v. Jones
299 P.2d 1 (California Supreme Court, 1956)
Estate of Cochran
253 P.2d 41 (California Court of Appeal, 1953)
In Re Benolken's Estate
205 P.2d 1141 (Montana Supreme Court, 1949)
Benolken v. Johnson
205 P.2d 1141 (Montana Supreme Court, 1949)
Batley v. Batley
193 S.W.2d 64 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1946)
Estate of Price
132 P.2d 485 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
In Re Estate of Trickett
239 P. 406 (California Supreme Court, 1925)
Smith v. Steen
150 P. 927 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1915)
De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.
1908 OK 49 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Boman v. Boman
49 F. 329 (Ninth Circuit, 1892)
Pearson v. Pearson
46 Cal. 609 (California Supreme Court, 1873)
McCourtney v. Mathes
47 Mo. 533 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1871)