Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Bradley
125 F. 1002, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4256
This text of 125 F. 1002 (Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Bradley, 125 F. 1002, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4256 (8th Cir. 1903).
Opinion
In Error to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory. W. A. Ledbetter, for plaintiffs in error. W. F. Bowman, for defendant in error. Motion of plaintiffs in error for leave to file and docket record denied. Writ of error docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to rule 16, on motion of defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
125 F. 1002, 60 C.C.A. 688, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hargadine-mckittrick-dry-goods-co-v-bradley-ca8-1903.