Harford v. Graves

Supreme Court of Florida

Harford v. Graves

136 So. 620, 102 Fla. 835

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 7, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So. 100, Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191, 126 So. 157.

Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings.

*836 Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So. 100, Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191, 126 So. 157.

Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings.

*836 Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Harford v. Graves, 136 So. 620, 102 Fla. 835 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

136 So. 620 (Harford v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related