Harford v. Graves

136 So. 620, 102 Fla. 835
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 7, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 136 So. 620 (Harford v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harford v. Graves, 136 So. 620, 102 Fla. 835 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should not have been sustained. Cummings Machine Works v. Clark, 89 Fla. 383, 105 So. 100, Garsed v. Sugarman, 99 Fla. 191, 126 So. 157.

Final judgment on demurrer reversed for appropriate proceedings.

*836 Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patten v. Daoud
12 So. 2d 299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Jones, Et Vir v. Hammock Et Ux.
179 So. 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Catlett v. Chestnut
146 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 620, 102 Fla. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harford-v-graves-fla-1931.