Harewood v. Aiken

New York Court of Appeals

Harewood v. Aiken

746 N.E.2d 182, 96 N.Y.2d 745, 723 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 111

DecidedFebruary 8, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 746 N.E.2d 182 (Harewood v. Aiken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harewood v. Aiken, 746 N.E.2d 182, 96 N.Y.2d 745, 723 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 111 (N.Y. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as effectively denied appellant’s motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Supreme Court’s order as effectively denied appellant’s motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

746 N.E.2d 182, 96 N.Y.2d 745, 723 N.Y.S.2d 127, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harewood-v-aiken-ny-2001.