Harell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Harell v. State

88 So. 341, 18 Ala. App. 66, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 55

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1921·No. 7 Div. 669.·Published

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The appellant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws, and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing one bas expired.

[1] Refused charges 1, 2, and 3 were substantially covered by the court’s oral charge.

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence, it is presumed that the trial court properly refused the affirmative charge requested by the defendant.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MERRITT, J.

The appellant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws, and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing one bas expired.

[1] Refused charges 1, 2, and 3 were substantially covered by the court’s oral charge.

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence, it is presumed that the trial court properly refused the affirmative charge requested by the defendant.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Harell v. State, 88 So. 341, 18 Ala. App. 66, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 55 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

88 So. 341 (Harell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.