Harell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Harell v. State

88 So. 341, 18 Ala. App. 66, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 55

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 15, 1921

Docket7 Div. 669.

StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 341 (Harell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harell v. State, 88 So. 341, 18 Ala. App. 66, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 55 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The appellant was convicted of a violation of the prohibition laws, and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of not less than one year and one day nor more than two years. There is no bill of exceptions, and the time for filing one bas expired.

[1] Refused charges 1, 2, and 3 were substantially covered by the court’s oral charge.

[2] There being no bill of exceptions, setting out the evidence, it is presumed that the trial court properly refused the affirmative charge requested by the defendant.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI