Hare v. State
552 So. 2d 874, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1989 WL 31886
Opinion
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Hare claims that he is entitled to incentive good time on a 15-year sentence which [875]*875was split with 2 years to serve in prison and 5 years on probation. We disagree.
This case is affirmed on authority of Thomas v. State, 552 So.2d 875 (Ala.Cr.App.1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hare v. State, 552 So. 2d 874, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1989 WL 31886 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).
552 So. 2d 874 (Hare v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
552 So. 2d 875 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)