Hare v. State
552 So. 2d 874, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1989 WL 31886
This text of 552 So. 2d 874 (Hare v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hare v. State, 552 So. 2d 874, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1989 WL 31886 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Hare claims that he is entitled to incentive good time on a 15-year sentence which [875]*875was split with 2 years to serve in prison and 5 years on probation. We disagree.
This case is affirmed on authority of Thomas v. State, 552 So.2d 875 (Ala.Cr.App.1989).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas v. State
552 So. 2d 875 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
552 So. 2d 874, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, 1989 WL 31886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hare-v-state-alacrimapp-1989.