Hare v. Hare
207 N.C. 849
Opinion
Equity will generally continue a temporary restraining order to the final hearing upon a prima facie showing for injunctive relief, especially when it appears that the respondent is indemnified against loss from its continuance and that injury might result to the petitioner from its dissolution. Boushiar v. Willis, ante, 511, and cases there cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hare v. Hare, 207 N.C. 849 (N.C. 1935).
207 N.C. 849 (Hare v. Hare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roberts v. Town of Cameron
95 S.E.2d 899 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Lance v. Cogdill
78 S.E.2d 319 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.
78 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Huskins v. Yancey Hospital
78 S.E.2d 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Little v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
182 S.E. 491 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)