Hare v. . Grantham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hare v. . Grantham

74 S.E. 102, 158 N.C. 598, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 96

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 20, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 102 (Hare v. . Grantham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hare v. . Grantham, 74 S.E. 102, 158 N.C. 598, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 96 (N.C. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is admitted that the case on appeal was not served within the time required by law, and therefore has not been sent up to this Court with the record.

The plaintiffs move the Court to affirm the judgment upon the face of the record.

The defendant moves the Court to dismiss the action because on the face of the complaint no cause of action is stated.

The Court, being of opinion that a cause of action is stated in the complaint, and that there is no error apparent' upon the face of the record, allows the motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI