Hardyman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hardyman v. State

113 So. 917, 22 Ala. App. 673

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1927

Docket6 Div. 132.

StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 917 (Hardyman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardyman v. State, 113 So. 917, 22 Ala. App. 673 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment contained two counts, and charged the defendant with the offenses of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors, a part of which was alcohol, and the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. The jury returned a general verdict of guilty as charged in-the indictment. To this indictment the defendant interposed demurrers, and assigned 27 separate and distinct grounds of demurrer, which were overruled. The indictment contained in this record has been approved as to form and substance innumerable times by this court. The demurrers are without merit, and the court properly so held. The appeal here is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. An examination of this record discloses -regularity in all things. As no error appears, the judgment of conviction in the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment contained two counts, and charged the defendant with the offenses of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors, a part of which was alcohol, and the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. The jury returned a general verdict of guilty as charged in-the indictment. To this indictment the defendant interposed demurrers, and assigned 27 separate and distinct grounds of demurrer, which were overruled. The indictment contained in this record has been approved as to form and substance innumerable times by this court. The demurrers are without merit, and the court properly so held. The appeal here is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. An examination of this record discloses -regularity in all things. As no error appears, the judgment of conviction in the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 917, 22 Ala. App. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardyman-v-state-alactapp-1927.