Hardy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hardy v. State

113 S.W.2d 918, 133 Tex. Crim. 619, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 150

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 16, 1938

DocketNo. 19432.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 S.W.2d 918 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardy v. State, 113 S.W.2d 918, 133 Tex. Crim. 619, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 150 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge. —

The charge is the unlawful possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area, to-wit: Delta County, and the punishment assessed being thirty days in the county jail.

The appellant complains of the fact that there was no testimony introduced showing the dry status of Delta County, and a perusal of the statement of facts bears out the correctness of such statement.

We have heretofore held, in a long line of cases, that the procedure relative to the adoption of such law should not only be pleaded but proven. See the late case of Baldridge v. State, 106 S. W. (2d) 700, and cases there cited. Such proof is absent in this case, and we have no alternative than to reverse and remand this case.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI