Hardy v. State

492 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9320
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1772
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 492 So. 2d 837 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. State, 492 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9320 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence for aggravated assault. The trial judge erred in scoring thirty-six points for victim injury which error caused appellant’s sentence to be greater than the sentencing guidelines allow. Although we relinquished jurisdiction for resentencing, the sentencing judge failed to resentence appellant within the time allotted for the jurisdiction to do so. Thus, we must write this opinion vacating the sentence and requiring the resentenc-ing. The sentence is vacated and this cause is remanded for a proper resentenc-ing.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond v. Hammond
492 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 So. 2d 837, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.