Hardy v. State
This text of 370 So. 2d 822 (Hardy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s acceptance of appellant’s plea of nolo contendere to the felony offense of dealing in stolen property, proscribed by Section 812.019(1), Florida Statutes (1977). However, we remand for correction of the order placing appellant on probation.
Appellant was placed on unsupervised probation. Section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that a defendant placed on probation for a felony shall be under the supervision of the Department of Offender Rehabilitation. This statutory requirement is mandatory. State v. Wilcox, 351 So.2d 89 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).
The order of probation is therefore vacated and the cause remanded for the entry of a new order consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 So. 2d 822, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.