Hardy v. State
228 So. 2d 440
Opinion
Appellant’s CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion was considered by the trial court to be frivolous and was denied.
After having considered the briefs and the record, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hardy v. State, 228 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
228 So. 2d 440 (Hardy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.