Hardy v. State

228 So. 2d 440
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1969·No. No. 69-398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion was considered by the trial court to be frivolous and was denied.

After having considered the briefs and the record, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. State, 228 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

228 So. 2d 440 (Hardy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.