Hardy v. Rundle
This text of 846 So. 2d 1174 (Hardy v. Rundle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Paul Hardy and Leo Salvatori seek review of the final judgment dismissing their complaint for writ of quo warranto. The complaint sought to prevent a special prosecutor from prosecuting count fourteen of a criminal information which charged Hardy and Salvatori with money laundering. We conclude that the executive order issued by the governor giving the special prosecutor the authority to prosecute certain matters did not encompass the claim for money laundering asserted in count fourteen. Accordingly, we reverse.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
846 So. 2d 1174, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6733, 2003 WL 21033772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-rundle-fladistctapp-2003.