Hardy v. Mobbs
303 A.2d 156, 131 Vt. 148, 1973 Vt. LEXIS 282
Opinion
This action was dismissed under the authority of Rule 25(a)(1) of V.R.C.P.
Since no application for relief from the application of the above rule was made under V.R.C.P. 6(b), the dismissal was proper. See 7A C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil Rule 25(a) (1972).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hardy v. Mobbs, 303 A.2d 156, 131 Vt. 148, 1973 Vt. LEXIS 282 (Vt. 1973).
303 A.2d 156 (Hardy v. Mobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doherty v. Straughn
407 A.2d 207 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1979)