Hardy v. Mayor of Eatonton

57 S.E. 99, 128 Ga. 27, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1907·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. Where, upon the trial of one charged with the violation of a municipal ordinance, the court, on conviction of the accused, rendered judgment that the defendant pay “a fine of twenty-five dollars, or, in default thereof, that he be imprisoned in the calaboose thirty days,” such judgment imposed an alternative sentence. Leonard v. Eatonton, 126 Ga. 63.

2. An attack upon the validity of the ordinance should have been made in the trial court. The question of its validity could not be raised for the first time in a petition for certiorari from that court to the superior court'. Duren v. Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1.

3. The finding and judgment of the municipal court was authorized by the evidence, and the judgment of the superior court refusing the certiorari is

Affirmed.

Fish, O. J., absent. The other Justices concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Mayor of Eatonton, 57 S.E. 99, 128 Ga. 27, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 10 (Ga. 1907).

57 S.E. 99 (Hardy v. Mayor of Eatonton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. City of Valdosta
167 S.E.2d 170 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Treadwell v. City of Social Circle
120 S.E.2d 195 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Brinkman v. City of Gainesville
64 S.E.2d 344 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Smith v. Mayor C. of MacOn
42 S.E.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Dodys v. State
36 S.E.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Bell v. City of Valdosta
171 S.E. 572 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Bolton v. City of Newnan
94 S.E. 236 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Mewborn v. Weitzer
84 S.E. 141 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)