Hardy v. Lansdell

130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 511, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 358
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 10, 1925
Docket16674
StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E. 222 (Hardy v. Lansdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. Lansdell, 130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 511, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 358 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; there is abundant evidence to support the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 S.E. 222, 34 Ga. App. 511, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-lansdell-gactapp-1925.