Hardy v. Hardee

170 S.E.2d 417, 225 Ga. 585, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 573
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 29, 1969·No. 25363·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

1. Where the trial court awards a 14-year-old child to the parent selected by such child as the parent with whom he desires to live, it is tantamount to a finding that such parent is fit, just as a denial of such child’s request must be construed as a finding that such parent is unfit. Compare Pritchett v. Pritchett, 219 Ga. 635, 636 (135 SE2d 417); Burney v. Burney, 222 Ga. 790 (152 SE2d 871).

2. Unless the evidence demands a finding contrary to the trial court’s judgment that a parent is “fit” or “unfit,” the judgment of the trial court on such issue is conclusive and will not be disturbed on appeal.

3. Where, as in the present case, the trial court awarded custody of the 14-year-old to the parent with whom he expressed a desire to live and the evidence does not demand a finding that such parent is unfit, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. See Ga. L. 1962, p. 713 (Code Ann. §§ 30-127, 74-107); Froug v. Harper, 220 Ga. 582 (140 SE2d 844).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Hardee, 170 S.E.2d 417, 225 Ga. 585, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 573 (Ga. 1969).

170 S.E.2d 417 (Hardy v. Hardee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodruff v. Woodruff
531 S.E.2d 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Harbin v. Sandlin
256 S.E.2d 360 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Vaughan v. Vaughan
223 S.E.2d 148 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Howell v. Gossett
214 S.E.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Hendrix v. McClelland
172 S.E.2d 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)