Hardy v. DG MacHinery & Gage Company
This text of 165 S.E.2d 127 (Hardy v. DG MacHinery & Gage Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The writ of certiorari was granted in this case to review the ruling of the Court of Appeals which *819 held that the motion to dismiss the appeal in that court on the ground that the transcript was not filed within thirty days of the filing of the notice of appeal as required by Code Ann. § 6-806 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 26) or within any extension of time obtained under Code Ann. § 6-804 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21) was without merit in view of the 1968 addition of Paragraph (d) to Section 13 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073, Sec. 2; Code Ann. § 6-809 (d)). D. G. Machinery & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 118 Ga. App. 45 (1) (162 SE2d 852).
Under the ruling of this court in Fahrig v. Garrett, 224 Ga. 817, the motion to dismiss the appeal should have been granted.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 S.E.2d 127, 224 Ga. 818, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-dg-machinery-gage-company-ga-1968.