Hardy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
119 A. 925, 98 N.J.L. 564, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 252
This text of 119 A. 925 (Hardy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hardy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 119 A. 925, 98 N.J.L. 564, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 252 (N.J. 1923).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Tren chard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White,. Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.
Far reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 A. 925, 98 N.J.L. 564, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-delaware-lackawanna-western-railroad-nj-1923.