Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2025
Docket8:24-cv-01364
StatusUnknown

This text of Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security (Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

KAYLA HARDY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:24-cv-1364-JRK

MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 1

Defendant. / ORDER This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. No. 24; “Motion”), filed January 27, 2025, that seeks to have this matter reversed and remanded to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings. Motion at 1. Such a disposition is clearly within the Court’s authority. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED.

1 Michelle King became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security in January 2025. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Ms. King is substituted for Carolyn W. Colvin as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment REVERSING AND REMANDING this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with the following instructions: On remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to further develop the record and ensure that evidence considered at the October 2012 comparison point decision (CPD) is added to the current record. In so doing, compare the prior and current medical evidence to determine whether there has been improvement in the symptoms, signs or laboratory findings associated with the impairments present at the time of the claimant’s most recent favorable medical decision. Further, the Appeals Council will direct the ALJ to exhibit the attempts to obtain evidence predating the CPD. 3. The Clerk is further directed to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida on January 28, 2025.

Trewin Boo K Reel JAMES R. KLINDT United States Magistrate Judge

kaw Copies: Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-commissioner-of-social-security-flmd-2025.