Hardy v. City of Orlando

613 So. 2d 603, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 1993 WL 33340
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-730
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 613 So. 2d 603 (Hardy v. City of Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardy v. City of Orlando, 613 So. 2d 603, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 1993 WL 33340 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat the instant appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982). A review of the record reveals that the circuit court afforded the petitioners procedural due process and applied the correct law in affirming the City’s actions in this matter.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

APPEAL TREATED as PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI and DENIED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
613 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 So. 2d 603, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1796, 1993 WL 33340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardy-v-city-of-orlando-fladistctapp-1993.