Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.

Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.

366 S.E.2d 485, 322 N.C. 106, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 121
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 6, 1988·No. No. 650A87·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The portion of the Court of Appeals opinion which vacates in part the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission is before us by virtue of the dissenting opinion of Phillips, J. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, that portion of the Court of Appeals opinion is reversed.

We conclude that defendants’ petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. The result is that the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission remains in full force and effect.

[107]*107In plaintiffs’ appeal, reversed.

In defendants’ appeal, discretionary review improvidently allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co., 366 S.E.2d 485, 322 N.C. 106, 1988 N.C. LEXIS 121 (N.C. 1988).

366 S.E.2d 485 (Hardy v. Brantley Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinsley v. City of Charlotte
747 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Miller v. Dorr
262 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kansas, 2003)
Hieb v. Lowery
516 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)