Hardwick v. State
This text of 206 S.E.2d 727 (Hardwick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of armed robbery, a felony. His application for bond pending appeal was denied and he appealed to this court. Held:
"The granting or refusing of bail in felony cases after indictment and conviction is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this court will not control that discretion unless it has been flagrantly abused. Bishop v. Wilbanks, 161 Ga. 305 (130 SE 819); Smith v. [722]*722State, 203 Ga. 636 (47 SE2d 866).” Watts v. Grimes, 224 Ga. 227 (161 SE2d 286). No abuse of discretion is shown under the record in this case and the action of the trial court is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 S.E.2d 727, 131 Ga. App. 721, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardwick-v-state-gactapp-1974.