Hardwick v. State
854 So. 2d 230, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12803, 2003 WL 22014749
This text of 854 So. 2d 230 (Hardwick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hardwick v. State, 854 So. 2d 230, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12803, 2003 WL 22014749 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant filing a legally sufficient motion filed pur[231]*231suant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), to address any alleged entitlement to additional jail credit. See Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (citing State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
854 So. 2d 230, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12803, 2003 WL 22014749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardwick-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.