Hardwick v. Gardiner

275 A.D.2d 900

This text of 275 A.D.2d 900 (Hardwick v. Gardiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardwick v. Gardiner, 275 A.D.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Memorandum: There is no appeal from that part of the order granting plaintiff summary judgment against the defendant and such order for judgment may not be disturbed. The only appeal before this court is from that part of the order which stays execution for ten days to permit the defendant to serve an amended answer. The defendant’s time to amend, of course, had expired. The court had no authority to grant defendant permission to serve an amended answer, upon mere request of counsel, and to stay execution pending such service. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from allows a stay of execution.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardwick-v-gardiner-nyappdiv-1949.