Hardouin v. Pradillo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hardouin v. Pradillo

50 So. 2d 834, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 590

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 26, 1951

DocketNo. 19523

StatusPublished

This text of 50 So. 2d 834 (Hardouin v. Pradillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardouin v. Pradillo, 50 So. 2d 834, 1951 La. App. LEXIS 590 (La. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

REGAN, Judge.

We granted a rehearing in this matter limited to t!he amount which should be al[835]*835lowed for replacing certain bronze or copper screens in defendant’s residence situated in William Davis Parkway. In our original decree, 48 So.2d 105, we permitted the defendant to deduct the sum of $150 for the purpose of replacing the bronze or copper screens with aluminum screens as specified in the building contract.

After a careful reconsideration of the matter we are of the opinion that the defendant should be entitled to deduct only the sum of $125 rather than the sum of $150 for this purpose.

For the reasons assigned our original opinion and decree is amended by increasing the amount thereof from $355.19 to $380.19, each party to bear his own costs, and, as thus amended, it is reinstated and made the final judgment of this court.

Our original decree amended and reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI