Hardnett v. Wilson

Fourth Circuit

Hardnett v. Wilson

597 F. App'x 163

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2015·No. No. 14-7594·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander J. Hardnett, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Hardnett leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for appointment of counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardnett v. Wilson, No. 3:13-cv-00497-JRS (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 6, 2014; entered Oct. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexander J. Hardnett, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Hardnett leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motion for appointment of counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hardnett v. Wilson, No. 3:13-cv-00497-JRS (E.D.Va. filed Oct. 6, 2014; entered Oct. 7, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hardnett v. Wilson, 597 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

597 F. App'x 163 (Hardnett v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related