Hardman v. State
This text of 701 So. 2d 1278 (Hardman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
Hardman brings an Anders1 appeal from his sentences received in five probation violation cases and eleven subsequent criminal cases. He entered guilty pleas to both the probation violation cases and the new criminal cases. He was sentenced as an habitual felony offender and received extensive sentences.2 We affirm.
Hardman entered guilty pleas, acknowledging he would be sentenced as an habitual offender. Since he failed to preserve any errors by objection below or by motion pursuant to revised Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800, there is nothing for this court to review. Hunter v. State, 700 So.2d 728 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); § 924.051, Fla. Stat.; Fla.App. R.P. 9.140(9). An examination of this record fails to disclose any issues which, even with guilty pleas, Hardman might have been able to raise pursuant to Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 903 (Fla.1979). See Isley v. State, 565 So.2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA (1990)).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 So. 2d 1278, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13951, 1997 WL 762023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardman-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.