Hardman v. Department of Highways
This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 287 (Hardman v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On August 9, 1984, at approximately 5:07 p.m., claimant’s vehicle struck a loose expansion joint on Interstate 64 near the Broad Street exit in Charleston, West Virginia. The vehicle, a 1979 Pontiac Lemans, sustained damage in the amount of $825.19. Claimant had [288]*288no knowledge of how long prior to his accident that the expansion joint had been loose. Herbert C. Boggs, Interstate Coordinator, testified that respondent’s records indicated work was performed on the expansion joint on the evening of August 9 or on August 10. He stated that the problem with the expansion joint was reported sometime after 5:00 p.m. on August 9.
The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of motorists on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W. Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). In order for respondent to be found liable for the damages incurred, proof of actual or constructive notice of the defect and a reasonable amount of time to correct it must be shown. As there was no proof of such notice, the claim must be denied.
Claim disallowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Ct. Cl. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardman-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1985.