Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis

40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 5, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 40 S.E. 702 (Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis, 40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734 (Ga. 1902).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. Where premises are abandoned by a tenant, the fact that the landlord allows other parties to occupy them temporarily without rent does not, without more, necessarily work a rescission of the contract of rental. Way v. Myers, 64 Ga. 760.

2. The evidence was conflicting, hut was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Distress warrant. Before Judge Butt. Macon superior court. January 8, 1901. A. T. Harper and DuPree & Harrison, for plaintiff in error. Greer & Felton, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Way v. Myers
64 Ga. 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardison-whisky-co-v-lewis-ga-1902.