Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis
40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734
This text of 40 S.E. 702 (Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hardison Whisky Co. v. Lewis, 40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734 (Ga. 1902).
Opinion
1. Where premises are abandoned by a tenant, the fact that the landlord allows other parties to occupy them temporarily without rent does not, without more, necessarily work a rescission of the contract of rental. Way v. Myers, 64 Ga. 760.
2. The evidence was conflicting, hut was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Way v. Myers
64 Ga. 760 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
40 S.E. 702, 114 Ga. 602, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardison-whisky-co-v-lewis-ga-1902.