Hardison v. Warden, No. Cv 92 1503 S (May 11, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Hardison v. Warden, No. Cv 92 1503 S (May 11, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4787

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMay 11, 1995

DocketNo. CV 92 1503 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4787 (Hardison v. Warden, No. Cv 92 1503 S (May 11, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardison v. Warden, No. Cv 92 1503 S (May 11, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4787 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION (RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OFPUBLIC DEFENDER) In this habeas corpus matter the attorney appointed as a special public defender has filed a Motion to Withdraw Appearance after concluding there is no non-frivolous argument in support of the petitioner's claim.

The Court has reviewed the memorandum submitted by said special public defender in support of his motion, see Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); State v. Pascucci, 161 Conn. 882 (1971); Franko v. Bronson, 19 Conn. App. 686 (1989). In addition the Court has reviewed the file and transcripts. CT Page 4788

Connecticut General Statutes § 18-98(d) sets forth the criteria for jail credit. The petitioner, pursuant thereto, is not entitled to the credit being sought and his claim is frivolous.

Accordingly, the Motion to Withdraw Appearance is granted.

Klaczak, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI