Hardison v. State

403 So. 2d 1139, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21129
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 1981·No. No. 81-692·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although appellant has not raised this point, the sentence imposed herein may be illegal under the doctrine of Villery v. State, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant seeking resentencing by raising the Villery issue in a motion filed in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hardison v. State, 403 So. 2d 1139, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

403 So. 2d 1139 (Hardison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rumbough v. City of Tampa
403 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)