Hardison v. State

403 So. 2d 1139, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21129
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 23, 1981
DocketNo. 81-692
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 So. 2d 1139 (Hardison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hardison v. State, 403 So. 2d 1139, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although appellant has not raised this point, the sentence imposed herein may be illegal under the doctrine of Villery v. State, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to appellant seeking resentencing by raising the Villery issue in a motion filed in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rumbough v. City of Tampa
403 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 So. 2d 1139, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardison-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.