Hardison v. Martin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hardison v. Martin

89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 607, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 630

DecidedSeptember 21, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E.2d 149 (Hardison v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardison v. Martin, 89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 607, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 630 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff on his own behalf and as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife instituted this action for the recovery of described articles of personal property.

From an adverse verdict and judgment the plaintiff brings the case here for review assigning errors. An examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that there was evidence to support the verdict, and that no substantial error in the rulings of the trial judge has been made to appear.

No error.

[608]*608WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff on his own behalf and as administrator of the estate of his deceased wife instituted this action for the recovery of described articles of personal property.

From an adverse verdict and judgment the plaintiff brings the case here for review assigning errors. An examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that there was evidence to support the verdict, and that no substantial error in the rulings of the trial judge has been made to appear.

No error.

[608]*608WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E.2d 149, 242 N.C. 607, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardison-v-martin-nc-1955.