Hardin's Bakery, Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441

Eleventh Circuit

Hardin's Bakery, Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441

893 F.2d 1188, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2608, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 882, 1990 WL 3580

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1990

Docket88-7469

StatusPublished

This text of 893 F.2d 1188 (Hardin's Bakery, Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hardin's Bakery, Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441, 893 F.2d 1188, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2608, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 882, 1990 WL 3580 (11th Cir. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. *

*1189 BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. *

*1189 BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

893 F.2d 1188, 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2608, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 882, 1990 WL 3580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hardins-bakery-inc-v-retail-wholesale-and-department-store-union-ca11-1990.