Harding v. Town of Townshend

42 Vt. 15
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided February 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

.Prout, J.

This case we are unable to distinguish in principle from Whitcomb v. Barre, 37 Vt., 148. It was put to the jury, distinctly upon the point of a loss of the use of the wagon injured during the time it was being repaired, which did not involve the inquiry as to the loss of profits, meanwhile, in plaintiffs’ business. The jury being thus restricted by the court upon the question of damages, we think the case referred to must govern us in the decision of this. The judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harding v. Town of Townshend, 42 Vt. 15 (Vt. 1869).

42 Vt. 15 (Harding v. Town of Townshend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. City of Springfield
158 N.E. 656 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.
92 A. 413 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1914)
Atwood v. Boston Forwarding & Transfer Co.
71 N.E. 72 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Ellis v. Hilton
6 L.R.A. 454 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
Keyes v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
30 N.W. 888 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1886)
Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Hudson
62 Ga. 679 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)