Harding v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Harding v. State

455 So. 2d 1011, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5530

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 28, 1984·No. 3 Div. 39·Published

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

In this case, issues have been raised by the petitioner which ordinarily require a hearing. The State of Alabama does not disagree, but rather has filed a motion asking that this cause be remanded for a hearing on the petition for writ of error coram nobis.

We must remand this case with instructions to the circuit court to conduct a hearing.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TAYLOR, Judge.

In this case, issues have been raised by the petitioner which ordinarily require a hearing. The State of Alabama does not disagree, but rather has filed a motion asking that this cause be remanded for a hearing on the petition for writ of error coram nobis.

We must remand this case with instructions to the circuit court to conduct a hearing.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Harding v. State, 455 So. 2d 1011, 1984 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5530 (Ala. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

455 So. 2d 1011 (Harding v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.